Communications Workshop One
Changing Jobs Following a Brief Period of Employment
Opting to take another job only a week after beginning a new job is not illegal, as people a free to come and go as they please. However, there are many consequences that must be considered before a conclusion is reached. Ethical implications, possible alternatives and other solutions should be identified and evaluated prior to taking action.
Professional Integrity
Company X would be extremely displeased of the actions of an employee who quit a job following an employment period of only 5 days. Firms make big investments in new employee's, not only is it costly to train new hires but searching and interviewing and selecting the best candidate takes time and money. Upon departure of the employee, Company X would have to begin the hiring process anew costing the firm additional money and using time that could have been utilized more efficiently on another task. Such a job change would be extremely unprofessional. It would appear that the person is immature, irresponsible, and indecisive among other things. Furthermore, it is highly unlikely that that firm will consider hiring him or her in the future. Additionally, if in the future, the individual meets with former co-workers and former management of Company X, it is likely that he or she will be received well. For example, if the person interviews with a firm in the future, where the interviewer is a former employee of Company X, my previous actions will place a strike against me in the mind of the interviewer.
Alternatives
Before making a decision, it would be wise to discuss the situation with people who the person respects and trusts. Whether it is a friend, a family member or a mentor, as much feedback as possible should be sought in order to make the best decision. If this option is unavailable, there are professional career coaches who specialize in dealing with situations such as this. In exchange for a fee, quality advice could be obtained from a professional. As attractive as a 10% increase of my current salary and a job closer to home may seem, the job at Company Y may still not be the best choice. The main reason why this is such a difficult situation is due to the fact the employee has not been at the job long enough to reap the many benefits it may bring. Additionally, it is not possible to know what to expect at Company Y. The grass may or may not be greener on the other side. Finally, the individual may not feel comfortable if other people find out that he or she quit a job after only a week to move home. Not only will this person be viewed untrustworthy in a professional capacity, but also many will think twice before dealing with the person in other situations.
Recommended Action
The employee should politely decline the job at Company Y. However, the employee should ask that his or her name and resume be kept on file for consideration for future openings. Additionally, the individual should retain a list of contacts for Company Y for possible use at a date in the future. It would be a poor career move for the person to comprise his or her professional integrity. It would be better to forgo the boost in salary and chalk it up to experience.
Memorandum
SUBJECT: Communications Workshop Two
Using a computer for personal reasons at work does not make someone a bad employee. However, a company who has a policy of not allowing their employees to use the computers for personal use is a company who does not value their employees and blatantly ignores the fact that there is more to life than work. Zero-tolerance policies will do more harm than good.
Companies must realize that while an employee is at work, they are forgoing all the activities that require attention between the hours of 9-5 such as banking. An employee who works such hours is not...
HRM Challenges in Today's Organizations All organizations require employees to make them a success and this function is considered as important as finance, machinery and land for running the organization successfully. The important point to note here is that individuals all have different temperaments and working methods, and some people in the organization are responsible for making them all work together. This is the job of the human resources department which
Leadership and Human Resources Sunflower Electric Power Corporation certainly had compelling circumstances that motivated management to pursue cultural change. Having recently undergone debt restructuring and charges of mismanagement and corruption, employee morale was at an all-time low. The major priority for the company was to completely change its corporation culture with a huge emphasis on interpersonal relationships. The culture of Sunflower was a command-and-control culture characterized by authoritative and conservative leadership. This
, 2010). The model includes several mediator (e.g., knowledge exchange) and moderator variables (e.g., self-leadership competencies of actors) that explain why and when this approach is effective and looks at leadership in more of a comprehensive way than focusing on one individual. Such perspectives have suggested that when employees become involved in the decision making processes then this can strengthen leadership. Transactional Leadership Transactional leadership is the leadership model that represents what
Soft Systems Techniques in the Preparation of Information Technology as a Systems Manager Company Systems Consulting process and model Systems approach, client relationships Company Culture Client defenses, attachments to existing systems Interaction with the company culture in order to facilitate change System and Culture working together Dependancy issues Lewin Company Systems Consulting process and model Systems approach, client relationships Company Culture Client defenses, attachments to existing systems Interaction with the company culture in order to facilitate change System and Culture working together Dependency issues Lewin's model of
The deal was immediately criticized as anti-competitive by William Kennard, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, and by the Communications Workers of America, which represents some workers at both of the merged companies. But neither government regulators nor union bureaucrats will have the slightest impact on the latest merger. They have neither the power nor the desire to oppose the plans of the giant telecommunications monopolies. More substantial opposition
Machine Translation and Horizons of the Future Almost everyone is familiar with the nifty Google feature which allows for instantaneous translation of foreign words. This automated or 'machine' translation is a convenient way to read websites in different languages. No longer does the reader need to know someone who speaks the foreign language or to hire a translator. The translation is provided quickly and easily, via 'machine.' However, for many
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now